Legal Opinion
Panos v. Prentiss
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 22, 1984No. 3-483A121PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Presiding Judge.
James Prentiss (James) sued Christ Pa-nos to enforce payment of his broker's commission for his and his father's (Richard) efforts to purchase certain property for Panos. The trial court entered a general judgment in favor of the Prentisses. Panos appeals and contends that the Pren-tiss' failure to fulfill a condition precedent of their oral contract nullified his duty to pay Prentiss.
Affirmed.
A general judgment is presumed to be based upon findings supported by the evidence; we must affirm the judgment on any legal theory. Wilson v. Upchurch (1981), Ind.App., 425…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. GolzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Billman v. HenselIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Cline v. RodabaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
- Gerardot v. EmenhiserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Marotta v. Iroquois Realty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Keithley's Auction Service v. Children of WrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Metropolitan Real Estate Corp. v. FreyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985