Legal Opinion

State v. Zahn

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1997No. Criminal 960190PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Wayne Zahn appeals from a district court order finding him in contempt of court. We affirm, concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding Zahn in contempt.

I

[If 2] Zahn and an acquaintance, Ida Fre-gien, were each charged with disorderly con duct following an altercation between them. Zahn appeared in Dickey County District Court on July 18, 1996, as a witness for the State in Fregien’s trial. Because Zahn had previously engaged in disruptive behavior in the courthouse and in the courtroom, the district court warned him about possible contempt…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. E. E. E., Inc. v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Mehl v. MehlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Kidd v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  5. State v. His ChaseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. BertramNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Mellum v. MellumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Holkesvig v. WelteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. SevignyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. HayesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API