Legal Opinion · Dissent

Adams v. Watkins

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1895Published

Error to Hillsdale. (Lane, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1DissentLong, J.

This is an action of assumpsit commenced in justice’s court, and, after a trial there, *433appealed to the circuit, where, on a trial before a jury, the plaintiffs had verdict and judgment.

The declaration alleges substantially that the plaintiffs were the owners of certain lands and premises in the declaration described, and that the defendant, in consideration that they would sell and convey to him the said premises, then and there undertook, promised, and agreed with the plaintiffs, among other things, to harvest and thresh one-third of the wheat then standing and growing upon 28 acres of said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strohauer v. VoltzMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Doty v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Vanderkarr v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Dean v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API