Legal Opinion
Harwood v. Auto-Owners Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided May 31, 1995No. Docket 162236, 163810PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Per curiam
These consolidated cases involve a claim by plaintiffs, Joanne Harwood, the Attorney General, and the Department of Social Services, for no-fault personal injury protection (pip) benefits. In Docket No. 162236, plaintiff Joanne Harwood appeals as of right the trial court’s amended order granting defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company’s second motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(0(10). In Docket No. 163810, defendant Auto-Owners appeals as of right the trial court’s order denying its first motion for summary disposition. We affirm.
Joanne Harwood, a Michigan resident, sought…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rohlman v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Botsford General Hospital v. Citizens InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Mayer v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Transamerica Insurance Corp. of America v. Hastings Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cvengros v. Farm Bureau InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Sisk-Rathburn v. Farm Bureau General InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Ghaffari v. Turner Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Stone v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.