Commonwealth General Corp. v. York
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by Justice YÁÑEZ.
This is an interlocutory appeal from the denial of a nonresident corporation’s special appearance. The trial court found that it had personal jurisdiction over the defendant and denied the special appearance. Appellant Commonwealth General Corporation (Commonwealth) brought this accelerated interlocutory appeal, contending that the evidence presented was legally and factually insufficient to support the trial court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction. Because we conclude that Commonwealth established sufficient minimum contacts to support the exercise of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Ortiz v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth General Corp. v. YorkTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Exito Electronics., Co., Ltd. v. Trejo, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
- Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Cassandra Marie Millionder, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2025
- Bob Hubenak, Individually and as President of Tidewater Oaks Owners Assoc. v. Robert Cromeens, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
- Commonwealth General Corporation v. William E. York as Independent of the Estate of Marguerite York, and James RobersonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.