Crosland v. Texas Employment Commission
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentRobertson, Associate Justice
I must respectfully dissent. The statute at hand, properly construed, does not allow the filing of a petition before the decision of the Commission becomes final. I do not agree that this strict construction leads to a “harsh and absurd” result, rather, I conclude that the language of the statute is clear and unambiguous, and that the prohibition of premature filing indicates a rational legislative intent to preserve the jurisdiction of the Commission, as well as to protect the rights of other parties to the administrative proceeding.
The court’s holding, as stated by the opinion of the Chief…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Brazos River Authority v. City of GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Love v. WilcoxTexas Supreme Court · 1930
- Federal Crude Oil Co. v. Yount-Lee Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1932
- Grasso v. Cannon Ball Motor Freight LinesTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Duncan v. MagetteTexas Supreme Court · 1860
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.