Legal Opinion
FUMELUS v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 27, 2022No. 1:18-cv-10237Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY SANDY ESPERANCE, No. 1:18-cv-10248 Plaintiff, v. OPINION DIAMOND RESORTS Defendant. BETSY FUMELUS, No. 1:18-cv-10237 Plaintiff, v. OPINION DIAMOND RESORTS Defendant. APPEARANCES: Richard H. Kim, Esq. THE KIM LAW FIRM, LLC 1500 Market Street, Suite W-3110 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102 On behalf of Plaintiffs, Sandy Esperance and Betsy Fumelus. William Patrick Reiley BALLARD SPAHR LLP 700 East Gate Drive Suite 330 Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054-0015 On behalf of Defendant, Diamond Resorts. O’HEARN, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs, sisters…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pittman v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Ridgewood Board of Education v. N.E., as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an Infant Mary E., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an Infant, Defendants/third-Party v. Frederick Stokley, Superintendent John Campion, Director of Special Programs Charles Abate, Principal William Ward, Principal Lorraine Zak, Psychologist Kathleen McNally Social Worker Caroline Janover, Ldt-C George Neville, Principal Henry Hogue, Psychologist June Ann Dibb, Dr., Psychiatrist Joan Christian, Ldt-C Susan Lynaugh, Psychologist, Third-Party N.E., as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an Infant Mary E., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an InfantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.