Legal Opinion

People v. Andeliz

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph Kevin McKay, J.

Introduction

An evidentiary hearing was held on February 9, 10 and 13, 2004 on defendant’s motion to suppress the physical evidence taken from the car and statements made by defendant to police on the scene before arrest. This was followed by argument and submission of legal authorities by both sides. The evidentiary record consists of the testimony of Sergeant Sharkey and Police Officer Collado, both of the anticrime unit in the 77th Precinct, and defendant Quenida Andeliz,1 as well as photographic exhibits of the interior and exterior of the vehicle…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. People v. HollmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. People v. IngleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. VonthadenNassau County District Court · 2006
  2. People v. PrinzingAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API