Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Budge v. Snyder

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1923No. 1179PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kimball, Justice.

This is an action in mandamus commenced in this court. The respondent is the state treasurer, who, it appears, has in his hands forest reserve funds which he is required by law to apportion to the counties containing forest reserve lands. Secs. 137, 138, Wyo. C. S. 1920. In making the apportionment he has awarded a part of the funds to the new county of Teton. The forest reserve landd and all other lands in this county were formerly included within the boundaries of Lincoln County from which the new county was carved. The action is brought in the name of the state, on the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Richman v. Supervisors Muscatine CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  2. Budd v. HancockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  3. Charlotte Harbor & Northern Railway Co. v. WellesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Fragley v. PhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Read v. PlattsmouthSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Witzenburger v. State ex rel. Wyoming Community Development AuthorityWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People Ex Rel. Barrett v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State ex rel Wyckoff v. RossWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Hanson v. Town of GreybullWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Addison v. FleenorWyoming Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API