Britt v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtBart F. Virden, Judge
A Benton County jury convicted appellant John Britt of raping his teenage daughter, and he was sentenced to forty years in the Arkansas Department of Correction. On appeal, Britt argues that the trial court erred in admitting expert testimony on Y-STR1 DNA testing because it does not comport with the standards set forth in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), and that the trial court's admission of such evidence violated Arkansas Rule of Evidence 702. We affirm.
I. Procedural History
On January 30, 2017, Britt was charged with one…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. FooteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ronald Huggins v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021
- John Britt v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2022
- John Britt v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2022
- Allwine v. Fca US, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025