Legal Opinion

Lucas v. Lively

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 8, 1949No. 33486PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuttrell, J.

The sole question for determination in this cause is whether the showing of diligence made by defendants below in support of their supplemental motion for new trial, on the ground of newly discovered evidence, was sufficient to require the trial court to sustain the motion. The trial court overruled the motion and defendants appeal.

Plaintiffs Shelton L. Lively and Victor McClanahan brought the action against defendants Sarah Augusta Lucas, W. W. Lucas, and others, to quiet their title to a tract of land in Seminole county. They alleged possession, and ownership by virtue of a county…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. House v. MainkaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Sarkeys v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Ball v. FleshmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Headley v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schultz v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. Reyes v. GossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Lewis v. ConleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Reyes v. GossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API