Legal Opinion
Jack Wolfskin Ausrustung Fur Draussen GmbH & Co. KGAA v. New Millennium Sports, S.L.U.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 19, 2015No. 2014-1789PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHEN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Jack Wolfskin Ausrustung Fur Draussen GmbH & Co. KGAA (Jack Wolfskin) applied to the Patent and Trademark Office to register a design mark consisting of an angled paw print for use with its clothing, footwear, and accessory products. Appellee New Millennium Sports, S.L.U. (New Millennium) opposed the registration on the ground that Jack Wolfskin’s mark would likely create confusion with its own registered mark. In response, Jack Wolfskin filed a counterclaim for cancellation alleging that New Millennium had abandoned its registered mark. The Trademark Trial and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Sands, Taylor & Wood Company v. The Quaker Oats CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Palm Bay Imports, Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee en 1772Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- In Re Viterra Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- In Re: I.am.symbolic, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Omaha Steaks International v. Greater Omaha Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Tiger Lily Ventures Ltd. v. Barclays Capital Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Spireon, Inc. v. Flex Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- Combe Inc. v. Dr. Aug. Wolff GMBH & Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.