Legal Opinion
Ventre v. Oetker
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 21, 1963No. Civ. No. 19140Published
1Opinion of the Court
ZAVATT, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff1 (hereinafter referred to as “Ventre”) is a longshoreman who was in the employ of the third-party defendant (hereinafter referred to as “International”). On June 9, 1958, he was working aboard the M/V Cap Frio, owned and operated by the defendant (hereinafter referred to as “Oetker”), when he was injured. He sues Oetker for negligence and for failure to provide a seaworthy ship. Oetker is suing International for indemnity, claiming that International contracted with it to perform stevedoring work for Oetker aboard said ship “in a safe, careful, competent and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Berti v. Compagnie De Navigation Cyprien Fabre (American Stevedores, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Frank Puddu v. Royal Netherlands Steamship Company, and Third-Party v. Maude James, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Gallagher v. United States Lines Co. (T. Hogan & Sons, Inc., Third Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- William Knox v. United States Lines Company v. T. Hogan ComporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Robillard v. AL Burbank & Co., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.