Legal Opinion

Shandley v. Levine

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to cancel a lis pendens.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

The action is brought to compel the defendants Levine to specifically perform an agreement, made December 16, 1903, to convey the real estate in question. The complaint further alleges: “ That thereafter (that is, subsequent to December 16, 1903) the defendants Israel Levine and Lena Levine (his wife) conveyed to the defendant Esther Berrent the premises herein described, and said Esther Berrent is the owner of the record title of said premises at this time.” The theory of the motion, as appears from the argument, is that the filing of the lis pendens was absolutely unwarranted, since Israel…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mills v. . BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Beman v. . ToddNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Brainerd v. WhiteThe Superior Court of New York City · 1882

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Andrews v. HancockNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Bowery Savings Bank v. WardNew York Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API