Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Hancock

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRhodes, J.

The allegations of the complaint for the purpose of this motion must be deemed to be true. It alleges in substance *801that plaintiffs entered into a contract with the defendant Hancock by which plaintiffs were to construct certain houses upon certain lots of said defendant; that plaintiffs have partly performed their contract and partially constructed said houses; that they have been prevented from completing their contract by the wrongful acts of the defendants who have conspired to cheat and defraud them by preventing them from performing; that in pursuance of such conspiracy the defendants…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Perry v. Board of Missions of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the DioceseNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Mills v. . BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Schomacker v. . MichaelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Beman v. . ToddNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. St. Regis Paper Co. v. Santa Clara Lumber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Billson Housing Corp. v. HarrisonNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Rosenberg v. RitterNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API