Andrews v. Hancock
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRhodes, J.
The allegations of the complaint for the purpose of this motion must be deemed to be true. It alleges in substance *801that plaintiffs entered into a contract with the defendant Hancock by which plaintiffs were to construct certain houses upon certain lots of said defendant; that plaintiffs have partly performed their contract and partially constructed said houses; that they have been prevented from completing their contract by the wrongful acts of the defendants who have conspired to cheat and defraud them by preventing them from performing; that in pursuance of such conspiracy the defendants…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Perry v. Board of Missions of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the DioceseNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Mills v. . BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Schomacker v. . MichaelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Beman v. . ToddNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- St. Regis Paper Co. v. Santa Clara Lumber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Billson Housing Corp. v. HarrisonNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Rosenberg v. RitterNew York Supreme Court · 1962