Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard Snyder
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 6, 1990No. 89-3929PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Richard Snyder argues that the district court incorrectly applied the Federal Sentencing Guidelines when sentencing him for his cocaine-related offenses. For the following reasons, we affirm the district court’s sentencing determination.
I
In February, 1988, the Mahoning County Task Force, working in conjunction with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, targeted Richard Snyder (“Snyder” or “appellant”) for investigation as an alleged cocaine dealer in the Youngstown area. The Task Force’s investigation was prompted by information (regarding…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Alexander DurriveCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Juan A. Acosta-CazaresCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Alfredo PerezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Diego RestrepoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Melody ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- United States v. Alicio M. Sanchez (89-2432) and Reinaldo Cubilla (89-2433)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Willie Kincaide (96-1771), Christian R. Key (96-1915), Keith Elbert Riley (96-1772)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Jerry WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Donald Miggins, Edward McDaniels and Charles Moore, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Travon GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.