Legal Opinion

State v. Houston

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1973No. 7322SC565PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Rule 11 of the General Rules of Practice for the Superior and District Courts states that “[w]hen several counsel are employed by the same party the examination or cross-examination of each witness for such party shall be conducted by one counsel, but the counsel may change with each successive witness or, with leave of the court in a prolonged examination.” This rule clearly leaves it to the discretion of the trial court to permit a change of counsel if a lengthy examination is imminent. Assuming the circumstances of the present case did not bring it within the purview of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. McPhersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. BronsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API