Legal Opinion
In Re Large
California Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 2007No. S127754PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
Petitioner in this habeas corpus proceeding is serving a life sentence under the “Three Strikes” law. (Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12.) He alleges he has been denied his “right to the exercise of the trial court’s discretion to dismiss one or more of [his] strike prior convictions.” (See People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497, 529-530 [53 Cal.Rptr.2d 789, 917 P.2d 628] (Romero).) On this basis, petitioner claims his sentence violates the due process clauses of the United States and California Constitutions. (U.S. Const., 14th Amend.; Cal.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- In re ColeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- In re BoyetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. FergusonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Babalola v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. Jonathan V. (In re Jonathan V.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.