Legal Opinion

Eui Seob Kim Ex Rel. Cleaners Co. v. Su Heon Kim

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 2004No. Civ.A.04-0018PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RUFE, District Judge.

This action stems from the parties’ efforts to develop, manufacture and distribute machines utilized in a “wet cleaning” process for “dry-clean only” clothing. Defendants move to dismiss this case under the anticipatory filing doctrine, and for lack of personal jurisdiction, improper venue and insufficient service of process. In the alternative, Defendants move to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. For the reasons below, the Court will deny the motion to dismiss and grant the motion to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Harold Pinker, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Roche Holdings Ltd. Harold PinkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  4. George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  5. Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. FMC Corp. v. AMVAC Chemical Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Koresko v. Nationwide Life, InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  4. Vasquez v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. Unlimited Technology, Inc. v. LeightonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API