Portland Water District v. Town of Standish
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.
[¶ 1] In this appeal, we are called upon to answer two questions: (1) does the common law doctrine of nullum tempus occurrit regí, “time does not run against the king,” apply in Maine to prohibit the taking of government owned land by adverse possession or prescriptive easement; and if so, (2) is the quasi-municipal special purpose Portland Water District a governmental entity for the purpose of applying the nullum tempus doctrine. We agree with the trial court (Cumberland County, Humphrey, C.J.) and answer both questions in the affirmative. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment in which the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Highline School District No. 401 v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Darling v. Augusta Mental Health InstituteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
- Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. J. W. Bishop & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Davies v. City of BathSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority v. Gruzen PartnershipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Portland Water District v. Town of StandishSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Francis v. Dana-CummingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- Moore v. AbbottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Moore v. AbbottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Page v. Amtrak, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2016