PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP v. Massey
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Chief Judge.
PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP (including its predecessor Coopers & Lybrand) (“PwC”) brings this interlocutory appeal contending that the trial court erred in denying its motion to dismiss the complaint of James D. Massey and Dennis E. Murray, Sr. (together, “Massey/Murray”), former directors of Conseco, Inc. (“Conse-co”). On appeal, PwC raises three issues of which we find the following to be dispos-itive: whether Massey/Murray’s claims are solely derivative in nature such that Massey/Murray have no standing to sue PwC in a direct action. 1
We reverse and remand.
FACTS…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Alcan Aluminium Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Philip Joseph Twohy, Jr. v. The First National Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- W & W Equipment Co., Inc. v. MinkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Barth v. BarthIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- G & N AIRCRAFT, INC. v. BoehmIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Holmes v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Div.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Fehribach v. Ernst & Young LLPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- The Board of Commissioners of Delaware County a/k/a Delaware County Commissioners v. Beverly J. EvansIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Carter Ex Rel. CNO Financial Group, Inc. v. HilliardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Schleicher v. WendtDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.