Legal Opinion
Bronk v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 7, 1998No. 97-1069, 97-1078PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal from an order holding that the minimum participation, vesting and funding requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (“ERISA”) mandate the inclusion in the defendants’ pension plans of “leased” employees who meet the definition of - common-law employees. The district court also held that such employees were properly excluded from the defendants’ welfare plans. We reverse the district court’s decision on the pension plans. We do not address the court’s decision on the welfare plans as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hockett v. Sun Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Renda v. Adam Meldrum & Anderson Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1992
- Burditt v. Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1997
- Crouch v. Mo-Kan Iron Workers Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Edes v. Verizon Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Kolling v. American Power Conversion Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Schultz v. StonerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Capital Cities/ABC, Inc. v. RatcliffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Scruggs v. ExxonMobil Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.