Dam v. General Electric Co.
District Court, E.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
DRIVER, Chief Judge.
Defendant, General Electric Company has moved for summary judgment. The motion is based upon a number of grounds, but only limitation and laches, set up as affirmative defenses in defendant’s answer, will be discussed. The others clearly appear to involve genuine issues of material fact and will not, therefore, be considered.
The second amended complaint, as further amended by deletion and interlineation, consists of three “causes of action.” The third involves only a defendant not now before the court. The allegations of the first “cause of action,” in so far as they are…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Metro Motors v. Nissan Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Ingram v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Metro Motors v. Nissan Motor Corporation In U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- ML Fashion, LLC v. NobelleDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Metro Motors v. Nissan Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003