Legal Opinion
Minemyer v. R-Boc Representatives, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 15, 2012No. 07 C 1763PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JEFFREY COLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On February 6, 2012, I issued a memorandum opinion discussing the question of the admissibility of plaintiffs Exhibit 40 under Rules 901 and 803(6), Fed.R.Evid. See Minemyer v. R-Boc Representatives, Inc., 2012 WL 379904, *4 (N.D.Ill.2012). Exhibit 40 is a 16-page document in power point form that was produced by Verizon during discovery pursuant to subpoena. It purports to be a report generated by Verizon in connection with its purchase in October 2006 of underground couplers, pursuant to a bid by defendant, Dura-Line…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ohler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- R-BOC Representatives, Inc. v. MinemyerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Minemyer v. R-Boc Representatives, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- R-Boc Representatives, Inc. v. MinemyerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014