Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chandler v. Chandler

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 15, 1978No. 77-396Published

1DissentJustice Stouder

I disagree with the conclusion of my colleagues that as a general proposition co-vendees under a land purchase agreement do not have an interest in real estate which may be subject to partition. I do believe such co-vendees have an interest subject to partition, although the interest may be limited by the provision of the land purchase agreement.

Section 1 of “An Act in relation to the partition of real estate * 0 *” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 106, par. 44) provides in part:

“When lands, tenements, or hereditaments are held in joint tenancy or tenancy in common, whether such right or title is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shay v. PenroseIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Boddiker v. McPartlinIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Ylonen v. YlonenIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Heldt v. HeldtIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Merritt v. MerrittIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API