Legal Opinion

People v. Martorana

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 1953No. Crim. 4990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

Defendant was convicted on February 7, 1952, of assault with intent to commit rape. His motion for a new trial was denied. He did not appeal.

In November, 1952, defendant filed an application for writ of error coram nobis together with a notice of motion therefor. He appeals from the order denying his petition.

Defendant’s application was based upon the asserted ground that a fraud had been perpetrated upon the court in that one of defendant’s witnesses, George R. Hubbard, had been prevented from testifying at his trial. From the affidavits in support of defendant’s application it appears that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. People v. ShortsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. People v. WatkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. AyalaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. People v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. People v. TannehillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. People v. TannehillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. AyalaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API