Saladino v. City of South Beloit
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daily
Stephen Saladino, the appellant, after first having sought unsuccessfully a change of zoning through administrative processes, filed a complaint in the circuit court of Winnebago County alleging that the zoning ordinance of the city of South Beloit, the appellee, is unconstitutional and void in its application to certain of his property, and praying that the city be enjoined from enforcing the same. Following a hearing of the cause, the complaint was dismissed for want of equity and this direct appeal has followed upon the chancellor’s certification that the validity of a municipal ordinance…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- People ex rel. Morrison v. CregierIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Mundelein Estates, Inc. v. Village of MundeleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
- La Salle National Bank v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Mayor of DanvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Borough of Fanwood v. RoccoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Floresta, Inc. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- First Nat. Bank of Elgin v. HustedAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- City of Norfolk v. Tiny House, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1981
- Foster & Kleiser, Division of Metromedia, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.