Legal Opinion

Ashcroft v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 10, 2004No. 00-01711 A118137PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) denying his request for discharge or conditional release. Petitioner asserts that: (1) the record is insufficient to support PSRB’s finding that he suffers from alcohol dependence; and (2) such a diagnosis is not a mental disease or defect within the meaning of ORS 161.295(2). We conclude that the record contains substantial evidence that petitioner suffers from alcohol dependence. See ORS 183.482(8)(c). But we adhere to our recent holding in Beiswenger v. PSRB, 192 Or App 38, 84 P3d 180 (2004), that alcohol…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beiswenger v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Laing v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Ashcroft v. PSRBOregon Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API