Legal Opinion

City of Delavan v. Thomas

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 30, 1975No. 74-363PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stengel

Defendant Thomas was convicted of operating a motion picture theatre without a license in violation of a municipal ordinance after his license had been revoked for permitting an obscene motion picture to be shown. On appeal from Ms conviction, defendant contends that the licensing ordinance was unconstitutional.

Delavan ordinance No. 73-6, section 4, provides:

“It shall be unlawful to permit any person to offer or present any motion picture or performance wMch is obscene.

For the purpose of this Ordinance a motion picture or performance is obscene if, whether to the average person, applying…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bayside Enterprises, Inc. v. CarsonDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1979
  2. People v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Cornflower Entertainment, Inc. v. Salt Lake City Corp.District Court, D. Utah · 1980
  4. 4447 CORP. v. GoldsmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. West Gallery Corp. v. Salt Lake City Board of CommissionersUtah Supreme Court · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API