Mann v. State

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

John Mann appeals his conviction for Operating While Intoxicated (OWI) with a previous conviction, a Class D felony. 1 Mann contends that the State failed to produce sufficient evidence to support his conviction. He also asserts that the State failed to authenticate documents concerning an alleged prior conviction from Ohio and that these documents were inadmissible hearsay. Finally, Mann asserts that his conviction should not have been enhanced to a Class D felony because the State failed to prove that he had previously been convicted of OWI under a similar…