Legal Opinion

Perkins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1988No. 53305PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Movant appeals after the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant entered an Alford plea to a charge of first degree robbery involving a January 29, 1983, offense and pled guilty to another first degree robbery charge involving a February 24, 1983, offense. He received two concurrent 17-year sentences.

In his Rule 27.26 motion, amended after appointment of counsel, movant claimed that his pleas were rendered involuntary by his trial attorney’s ineffectiveness. He alleged counsel failed to contact alibi witnesses and eyewitnesses, failed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  4. Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Armour v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. State v. RobinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Van Ralston v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Ducept v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Ryan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API