Erling v. Haman

*216MURRAY, Judge.

The appellants appeal from three orders, namely:

Order denying motion to vacate order appointing Master.

Order dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint.

Final order dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint.

Of the three orders above listed, the first we find it unnecessary to deal with. The second order was by its own terms not appealable, being interlocutory and not final. We do find it necessary to deal with the third order appealed from.

Further, procedurally, only the plaintiffs, Margaret Erling, James Erling, and R. W. Henderson have appealed. Plaintiffs Larry F. Davis and Mary Davis did not…