Legal Opinion
Clarkson v. Coughlin
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 3, 1992No. 91 Civ. 1792 (RWS)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Thomas A. Coughlin, III (“Coughlin”), Robert Greifinger (“Greifinger”), Marion Borum (“Borum”), Elaine A. Lord (“Lord”), and Raul Russi (“Russi”) (collectively the “Defendants”) have moved to dismiss Plaintiff Doris Clarkson’s (“Clarkson”) complaint against them on the ground that the action is moot. Defendant Lord also has moved separately for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the ground that she is not a proper defendant to this action. In the alternative, the Defendants seek to transfer this action to the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- German v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- German by German v. Federal Home Loan Mortg. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Clarkson v. CoughlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Perrine v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.