Legal Opinion

Francis v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1923No. 3616PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pierson

For the purposes of this opinion, the following will be a sufficient statement of the case:

This suit was instituted by plaintiff in error, J. H. Francis, as administrator of the Estate of Porter Francis, deceased, against defendants in error to recover damages on account of the death of his adult son, Porter Francis. Porter Francis at the time of his death was twenty-nine years of age, unmarried, and according to the testimony of plaintiff in error gave to his parents all of his wages ($2.10 or $2.20 per day), except what he spent for clothes. Plaintiff in error alleged that he and his wife…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Saint Louis, Arkansas & Texas Railway Co. v. JohnstonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. International & G. N. R. R. v. KindredTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Lipscomb v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1901
  4. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. LongTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. SchindlerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Sharyland Water Supply Corp. v. City of AltonTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Rogers v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. McStay v. PrzychockiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  5. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API