Legal Opinion
Hayden v. 2K Games, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 21, 2019No. Case No. 1:17CV2635PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, United States District Judge
This matter comes before the Court upon the Motion (ECF DKT # 14) of Defendants to Dismiss in part Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. For the following reasons, the Motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On December 18, 2017, Plaintiff James Hayden filed his Complaint against Defendants 2K Games Inc. and Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (collectively, "Take-Two") alleging: 1.) Direct Copyright Infringement in violation of 17 U.S.C. §§ 106(5) and 501 ; 2.) Indirect Copyright Infringement; 3.) Unjust…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Directv, Inc. And Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. Mark Treesh, Commissioner for the Department of Revenue for the State of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Horizon Global Americas, Inc. v. Northern Stamping, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
- Louisville City School District Board of Education v. Local 4 Ohio Association of Public School Employees (OAPSE)/AFSME AFL-CIODistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
- Priorities USA v. NesselDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- The Property Management Connection, LLC v. The Consumer Financial Protection BureauDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021