Legal Opinion

(PC) Porteous v. Avila

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 7, 2022No. 1:21-cv-00529Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 LARRY BRIAN PORTEOUS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00529-SAB (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S 12 v. SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL 13 R. AVILA, et al., (ECF No. 29) 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff Larry Brian Porteous is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 17 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s second motion to compel, filed July 21, 2022. 19 I. 20 RELEVANT BACKGROUND 21 This action is proceeding against Defendant R.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
  3. Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Surfvivor Media, Inc. Peter S. Deptula v. Survivor Productions CBS Broadcasting Inc. CBS Worldwide, Inc. Wpc Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. In Re Bankers Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API