Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Amity Township Board of Supervisors

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 7, 2002PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEADBETTER.

Christopher Peterson appeals from the April 27, 2001 order of the Berks County Court of Common Pleas that quashed his land use appeal as untimely. For the reasons stated herein, we reverse.

Intervenor Vanguard Development Corporation is the equitable owner of a 142.6-acre tract of land in Amity Township. On March 21, 2000, Vanguard filed an application for approval of a preliminary subdivision plan, proposing to subdivide this property into 192 lots for single-family residences, a development to be known as Highmeadow Estates. Peterson is the co-owner of land…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gargano v. Terminix International Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Peden v. Gambone Bros. Development Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Bonner v. Upper Makefield TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Rouse/Chamberlin, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Degroot v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Narberth Borough v. LOWER MERION TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Nextel Partners, Inc. v. Clarks Summit BoroughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Maple Street A.M.E. Zion Church v. City of WilliamsportCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Koller v. Weisenberg TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. First Avenue Partners, a PA limited partnership v. The City of Pittsburgh Planning CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API