Legal Opinion

Bell v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 30, 2022No. 3:20-cv-01135-YYUnknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION ASHLEY B.,1 Plaintiff, Case No. 3:20-cv-01135-YY v. OPINION AND ORDER COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. YOU, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Ashley B. seeks judicial review of the final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”),

42 U.S.C. §§ 401-33, and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) disability benefits under Title XVI of the Act,

42 U.S.C. §§ 1381

-1383f. This court…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Lingenfelter v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API