Ripon Knitting Works v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed February 9, 1932:
Rosenberry, C. J.
The facts in this case disclose a situation with which courts are often obliged to deal, where one or the other of two innocent parties must suffer by reason of *457the wrongful acts of a third. The defendant believed, not without reason, that Lambert was an honest and faithful employee and worthy of its trust and confidence. The plaintiff dealt with the defendant through Lambert upon th.e same assumption. Both parties trusted him, each relied upon his honesty and probity, and each has been deceived and' wronged. As to the factual…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gleason v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Friedlander v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Jacobsen v. WhitelyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Berkovitz v. Morton-Gregson Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1924
- Zummach v. PolasekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ricketts v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Dudley v. Estate Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
- Lucas v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1968
- Mattice v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Shrier v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.