Legal Opinion

Thomas v. United States

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 31, 1999No. C2-96-369PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

MARBLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Roy V. Thomas won the Ohio Lottery Super Lotto Jackpot, worth almost nine million dollars, in the December 12, 1992 drawing. The State of Ohio took about six weeks to process his claim, and Mr. Thomas received his money on January 28, 1993. Until 1993, the IRS taxed prize-winnings at a rate of twenty percent, but beginning in January, 1993, it instituted a rate of twenty-eight percent. Plaintiffs Roy Thomas and his wife Eloise 1 now argue, under the “economic benefit” doctrine, that the prize should have been included as income for 1992, rather…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Clarence Erwin Copeland v. Mark MacHulis James StephensCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Womack v. Commissioner of IRSCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API