Legal Opinion
Templar Motors Co. v. Bay State Pump Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 8, 1923No. 3774PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
This writ is to review a judgment rendered in favor of the defendant in error (plaintiff below) against the plaintiff in ¿rror (as defendant) for the latter’s refusal to accept the full 10,000 so-called Copley primers (for use on automobiles) contracted in the month of October, 1919, by defendant’s predecessor to be purchased from plaintiff, the obligations of which contract had prior to its alleged breach been assumed by defendant. On July 21, 1920, defendant, which had already received and accepted 4,200 primers, refused to accept any more. Hence this suit.1 Jury was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Cleveland v. Walsh Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- Mason v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- Miami Cycle & Mfg. Co. v. National Carbon Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
- Corey v. Atlas Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. Norwich Pharmacal Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Robilio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- United States v. Mammoth Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Canadian Nat. Ry. Co. v. George M. Jones Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- H. P. Cummings Const. Co. v. Marbleloid Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.