Legal Opinion

Shove v. Burkholder Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 5, 1923No. 23,075PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The action is for damages sustained through the alleged false and fraudulent representations by defendants as to certain stock and mortgages given in exchange for plaintiffs’ house and lot in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and for a lien therefor on the house and lot. Plaintiffs prevailed. Defendants appeal from the order denying a new trial.

The trial was to the court. In the oral argument counsel for defendants frankly conceded that this court should not hold the findings that defendants had made the fraudulent representations un*139sustained, but he insists that the finding that plaintiffs relied…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carli v. Stillwater & Saint Paul RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  2. Humphrey v. SieversSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Peters v. TunellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Townsend v. JahrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Dawson v. Thuet Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Osborn v. WillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Grace Development Co., Inc. v. HoustonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Soukup v. WenischSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Brooks v. ThorneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API