Legal Opinion

People v. Den Uyl

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1948No. Calendar No. 43,962PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

This is an appeal in the nature of mandamus from an order continuing the preliminary examination in the above case made by Honorable Chester P. O’Hara, one of the circuit judges for Wayne county sitting as the examining magistrate in Ingham county. Appellants claim that the denial of their repeated demands to conclude their preliminary examination on the charges against them and the repeated-granting of continuances for more than 18 months over their objections, is a violation of their constitutional and statutory right to a speedy examination and trial. The delay has been caused by the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In Re BegerowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Harris v. Mun. Court of L.A.California Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State v. KeefeWyoming Supreme Court · 1908
  4. People v. MurrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Ex Rel Eubanks v. Cole, District JudgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. People v. GrimmettMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. ChismMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Thomas v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. KrumMichigan Supreme Court · 1965

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API