Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen v. United Transportation Union
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum and Order
PRATTER, District Judge.
Defendant National Railway Labor Conference (“NRLC”) moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) for dismissal of the claims against it in this ease concerning allegations that the defendants conspired to violate the Railway Labor Act by negotiating and executing a letter of intent under collective bargaining agreements with the United Transportation Union. For the reasons discussed below, the motion will be granted.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Martin Crothers and George Tompkins are employees of Defendant CSX and members…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Leone v. CataldoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- TruePosition, Inc. v. LM Ericsson Telephone Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- ABIRA MEDICAL LABORATORIES, LLC v. JOHNS HOPKINS HEALTHCARE, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020