Legal Opinion

United States v. Guyton-Bhatt

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided February 23, 2001No. ARMY 9800418PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CARTER, Judge:

A general court-martial composed of officer members convicted appellant, contrary to her pleas, of dishonorable failure to pay a just debt, lying, and presenting an altered promissory note, in violation of Article 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 933 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The adjudged sentence consisted of a dismissal, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and a reprimand. The convening authority approved a sentence to a dismissal, forfeiture of $2,472.00 pay per month for eighteen months, and a reprimand. *797This case is before the court for…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. GibsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. Damatta-OliveraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
  2. United States v. Guyton-BhattCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  3. United States v. Guyton-BhattCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  4. United States v. Guyton-BhattCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API