Legal Opinion

People v. Rumph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unani*1036mously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the assertion of defendant that the prosecutor failed to offer a valid race-neutral explanation for his use of a peremptory challenge to excuse an African-American potential juror. Defense counsel failed in the first instance to establish a prima facie case of discrimination (see, Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79). The broad statements by defense counsel that he did not feel there was a "truthful reason” for excluding the juror "other than the fact that she is African-American” and that he did not note any "facial gestures” on her part were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. People v. ChildressNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. BollingNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. BoydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. People v. JarvisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. People v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API