People v. Rumph
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unani*1036mously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the assertion of defendant that the prosecutor failed to offer a valid race-neutral explanation for his use of a peremptory challenge to excuse an African-American potential juror. Defense counsel failed in the first instance to establish a prima facie case of discrimination (see, Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79). The broad statements by defense counsel that he did not feel there was a "truthful reason” for excluding the juror "other than the fact that she is African-American” and that he did not note any "facial gestures” on her part were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- People v. ChildressNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. BollingNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. BoydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. JarvisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998