Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Eugene Price and James Terrence Price

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 19, 1981No. 80-1595, 80-1765PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:

This case requires us to determine the meaning of the terms “falsely made” and “forged” in a criminal statute. James T. Price was indicted for the interstate transportation of falsely made or forged securities in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314, 1 and Michael E. Price was charged with aiding and abetting the crime. 18 U.S.C. § 2. Both were convicted after a bench trial, and they join in this appeal. We affirm.

The case was tried largely by stipulation, and the essential facts were not in serious dispute. Michael lived in Texas and James, his older brother, lived in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Greathouse v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  2. People v. LevitanNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Hugo Bob Hubsch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  4. Wright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  5. Martyn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Daniel Michael Daly, Harold Dean Klemp, Joseph Diaz, Gene Floyd Criswell, and Michael Richard RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Gabriel Santos Alvarez v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  4. Sales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. United States v. Gregory Vincent HuntCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API