Legal Opinion
McNamara & Goodman v. Pink
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided January 16, 1997No. File CV930346405PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHodgson, J.
The present action was filed by the plaintiff, a law firm, seeking a declaratory judgment as to how much of the proceeds of an ante mortem uninsured motorist recovery settlement should be distributed to it and to others identified on a settlement statement and how much should be deposited with the Probate Court.
In its amended complaint, the plaintiff, which represented the decedent in the proceedings that led to the creation of the asset at issue, seeks a declaration from this court determining: “(1) Whether or not the plaintiff, as trustee, may disburse to medical, legal service providers…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Recht v. Clairton Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Marsh, Day & Calhoun v. SolomonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Department of Public Works v. Exchange National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Siciliano v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Diamond v. DiamondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. SmigelskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Global Injury Funding, LLC v. Knight (In re Knight)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- McGannon v. Kramer, No. Cv89-0298295s (Oct. 3, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000