Legal Opinion

Stiers v. Mundy

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1910No. 21,715PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From Rush Circuit Court; Will M. Sparks, Judge. Suit by Minnie M. Mundy and others against Sarah E. Stiers and others. From a decree for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, C. J.

Appellees brought this suit for partition and to quiet title. The court, at the request of the parties, made a special finding of facts and stated conclusions of law thereon. It appears from the special findings that Frances L. Hildreth died testate on November 27, 1903, the owner of the real estate in controversy; that her will, which was duly admitted to probate, gave all of her real estate to James M. Hildreth, her husband, during his life, and upon his death it was directed that said real estate be sold and the proceeds divided among appellees, the heirs of said Frances L. Hildreth, the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. BabbitSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  2. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Parks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Rose v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Blakemore v. DolanIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Albert v. Milk Control Board of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Connelly v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. State v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Board of Commissioners v. ScanlanIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. O'Donnell v. KrnetaIndiana Supreme Court · 1958

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API