Legal Opinion

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Ely

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1906No. 14,342PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the district court for Sarpy county: Abraham L. Sutton, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Oldham, C..'

This was an action instituted by the plaintiff, as lessee of á farm situated in Sarpy county, Nebraska, for damages to his growing crops caused by the overflow of a running stream. The grounds of the action were that the defendant railway company negligently constructed its roadbed so that it obstructed- the channel of a stream of running water, and that by virtue of this obstruction the waters of the stream were dammed up and caused to flow back and remain on the land where the crops were growing, thereby causing a partial loss of all the crops growing on the leased premises. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago, Bock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. AndreesenNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley Railroad v. GaytonNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. MitchellNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Gartner v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morse v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Robinson v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Iske v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API